'"Issuer" OF HIS REGIME I try to analyze some typical examples of repeated lexical impoverishment dall'imbonitore preparatory to the government and that the majority of citizens has long been digested and assimilated.
Generally mottoes expressed by a system can be easily distinguished from the banality of the content, the decline in the common places, the appeal to sentimentality, the promise.
Any reference to the policy is abhorrent, the only goal of communication is the reversal of meaning:
"THE PARTY OF FARE:
implies a revolution in politics. Absorbing without reflection (as the absent-minded and disinterested) these words, one is led to believe that a "party of making" is something that arises out of the "old politics" inserting themselves into the social context of the productive "modern and dynamic. "
Many are left at times lazily and pleasantly deceived by these words without content do not allow anyone to understand, it reflective because it does not express a political concept ma determinano un’azione, trascendendo alla regola fondamentale sulla quale poggia la Democrazia: Il dibattito.
Un “partito del fare” quindi non discute con chicchessia poiché al contrario del partito politico, quello del fare “fa”.
Il fare è indiscutibile.
Non si capisce però “fare che cosa?”.
Ecco la risposta: alla definizione si aggiunge un'altra parola povera e comune come: “lavorare” .
“LASCIATEMI LAVORARE”:
Il partito del it then works. Others are not.
Let me work implies an iron will to spend for the common good but difficult to achieve because of impediments that seem beyond their control.
It 's a lie of course. No one can prevent the President of the Council to exercise its function especially if backed by a government with a large majority (as it was Berlusconi's government for many years and until a few months ago.)
However, in this sentence, I believe that Silvio Berlusconi is a man incapable of lying consciously integrates into an overriding desire for help: the liberation of obstacles that block his declared willingness to work. But who would prevent the Prime Minister to work?
Here he reveals the "impediment" (in this case exceptionally unlawful)
"THE PERSECUTION OF THE JUDICIARY:
Berlusconi likes to quote himself number of searches (several hundred) of the Finance Police at its many companies, the Premier attacks a basic principle of the judiciary: the ability of the investigative bodies to investigate (for justifiable reasons or simple controls) if they were committed offenses. Berlusconi is defined by inverting the truth: "persecuted and evader."
The logic of this man is devilishly trivial and easily assimilated by all this:
"If the financial police raided hundreds of times in my business and I find myself still on the loose, more preside as Chairman of the Board, means that they are innocent or even better, persecuted. "Then he adds:" Even if I was liable because of acts committed before his election, these non hanno più valore perchè il popolo (supremo giudice) preferendo me mi ha assolto".
Peccato che il popolo, distratto dalla politca e pilotato verso altri interessi effimeri, non conosca la reale portata dei reati commessi da quest'uomo.
Ovviamente Berlusconi non è perseguitato ne tantomeno innocente in quanto i processi a suo carico sono stati e sono tuttora numerosi. Pochi sono terminati con assoluzione, la maggior parte lo hanno giudicato colpevole ma prosciolto a causa della decorrenza dei termini (grazie alle leggi personali che lo hanno salvato; le stesse che impediscono attualmente la celebrazione di altri processi già istruiti).
Inoltre the incessant denunciation of persecution in a country like ours, where the unpaid taxes are at the top of the EU average, is convenient and instant credibility with the multitude of entrepreneurs evaders scattered throughout the country.
The reality speaks instead of blatant tax evasion (the over 60 companies "of convenience" off-shore due to Silvio Berlusconi and which boasts the same) testified. For this reason, the judiciary, after gathering evidence but instructed the processes to which the present Prime Minister is opposed to relying on:
"LEGITIMATE IMPEDIMENTO”
Ovviamente “il partito del fare” e del “lasciatemi lavorare”, non può permettersi di perdere tempo a farsi processare non perché contrario alla regole della giustizia, non sia mai! Ma solo perché auto proclamatosi: innocente o perseguitato.
Tuttavia questa banalissima sequenza di motti e sillogismi al rovescio sono entrati a far parte ormai del linguaggio politico comune tant’è che nessuno fa più caso al vuoto pneumatico che contengono. Ogni tanto sono adottati persino dagli oppositori che si propongono anch’essi with a willingness to dialogue and support for the government while the "to do" are good and collective interest. The enactment of personal laws, unjust and unfair while continues smoothly. The general indifference too. "Things to do," remain such.
However, despite the efforts aimed at impoverished language, the cultural level, the critical capacity of an entire nation, the systems sometimes have opposed dialectically effective and preparations, such as to endanger the status quo . front of well-articulated arguments and difficult to counter, that political arguments, the regime uses it to new terms referring to popular sentiment and indifferent as:
"Love conquers hatred" to clear the debate and avoid the confrontation.
resorting to clichés relating to the sentimentality, the release of the political language becomes authentic and original total.
Everything is opposed to the scheme is wound up as a feeling of hatred or envy even more banal. However everything is in line, aligned to the ideas of regime, becomes love.
The appearance of features sentimental in power or the opposition is completely subjective and arbitrary. The battle between love and hate had a great impact because the words are attributable to common and recurring feelings that do not lend themselves to any critical reflection as instinctive feelings, never right.
the ball of hatred are easily attributable to the magistrates for example, that the exercise of their functions adopt survey methods (wiretapping, interrogation) that have nothing to do with loving gestures, or understanding.
Or students or any other category to see who exhausted their rights trampled on the streets to demonstrate. Oppurtanamente the system translates each event in protest of hate against love, criminalizing dissent democratic .
the sphere of love instead are associated with friends, relatives, exchange of favors, mutual support corporate, the members are aligned and comply with the will of the regime.
T policy is totally disrupted and reinterpreted so dangerously fascist monarchy. Is prohibited, ideas or political opponents, sometimes excluding even dissent within the party itself.
rage: the favor and gratitude.
The politics of social good, that is, toward themselves and others in an egalitarian is forgotten. Inequalities fuel social conflict and the premise: "love conquers hate" is upside down. but no one notices. yet to expose our pathetic mona-rca (or King of the monastery), just to hear his voice. During election campaigns, especially the beginning of his appearance on the political scene, Silvio Berlusconi reiterated that if elected he would not like other governments:
"DO NOT put your hands into the pockets of ITALIAN" suggesting that a democratic state does not ask for taxes to the citizens, but if you pay yourself.
course most of the Italians, especially those belonging to autonomous corporations, immediately drink, guzzle even the bestiality of the dwarf under the illusion that the state, whether governed by Berlusconi, had been able to self sustain. Unfortunately, after another rise to power of the gullible could consider nano one "regency car," Mrs. Brambilla stockings. Taxation in Italy has increased, not decreased.
The scheme has achieved its purpose, however, took power with the use of the word corrupted and tampered with.
also promised an end in itself, is a typical expression of a political fascist empire.
promises in politics do not exist. In the language of serious political promise is expressed in the form of projects discussed at length and finally adopted, not from television lounges using monologues or worse shoulder inserts of players like Bruno Vespa.
addition al danno la beffa, la tassazione dei cittadini è aumentata, i servizi sono diminuiti ma il nano, grazie ad un’altra legge personale (la n° 73 sulla riforma del fisco) riservata alla sua azienda , ha potuto beneficiare, proprio nel 2010 di uno sconto di molti milioni di euro che Mondadori avrebbe dovuto pagare.
Importo della sanzione: 350 milioni di euro, importo della stessa dopo la legge “ad aziendam”: 8,6 milioni di euro.
I restanti 341 milioni chi li paga? Naturalmente noi tutti.
Quindi il regime infila eccome le mani nelle nostre tasche. Perché Il regime pur di non perdere la faccia, ruba non chiede.
Kills culture, without the social and economic growth of a country, upsets the rules, the concepts down, corrupt, annihilates, sleep, sedation.
The scheme remains, not.
